<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 553 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396178</link>
    <description>The High Court admitted a writ petition filed by a petitioner in a dispute involving Central Excise duty recovery and penalty imposition. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was dismissed for noncompliance with deposit orders, prompting the petitioner to seek resolution under the &quot;Sabka Vishwas&quot; Scheme. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit a specific amount and instructed the Appellate Tribunal to promptly hear the appeal, addressing the pending status and tax liability issues. Further directions were given for maintaining the deposited amount during the pendency of the writ petition, with ownership resolution deferred to the final hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 553 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396178</link>
      <description>The High Court admitted a writ petition filed by a petitioner in a dispute involving Central Excise duty recovery and penalty imposition. The petitioner&#039;s appeal was dismissed for noncompliance with deposit orders, prompting the petitioner to seek resolution under the &quot;Sabka Vishwas&quot; Scheme. The Court directed the petitioner to deposit a specific amount and instructed the Appellate Tribunal to promptly hear the appeal, addressing the pending status and tax liability issues. Further directions were given for maintaining the deposited amount during the pendency of the writ petition, with ownership resolution deferred to the final hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396178</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>