<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (11) TMI 65 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22584</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing relief under section 80HH for the income from the sale of import licences and incentives for export. The court emphasized that legislative changes had made such income eligible for benefits under section 80HH, despite earlier decisions to the contrary, and applied the law as it stood at the relevant time. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments and concluded that the income from the sale of import licences qualified for relief under section 80HH.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:46:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (11) TMI 65 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22584</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing relief under section 80HH for the income from the sale of import licences and incentives for export. The court emphasized that legislative changes had made such income eligible for benefits under section 80HH, despite earlier decisions to the contrary, and applied the law as it stood at the relevant time. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s arguments and concluded that the income from the sale of import licences qualified for relief under section 80HH.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>