https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288697 The Tribunal dismissed the Liquidator's application seeking permission to file cases against defaulter Corporate Debtors before the Mumbai Bench of NCLT, emphasizing jurisdiction based on the registered office location. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction cannot be altered under section 60(5) of the IBC, maintaining that cases should be filed where the company's registered office is situated. The application was rejected as the Tribunal found it lacking merit, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions on jurisdiction and preventing circumvention through section 60(5) of the Code. en-us Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:40:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288697 The Tribunal dismissed the Liquidator's application seeking permission to file cases against defaulter Corporate Debtors before the Mumbai Bench of NCLT, emphasizing jurisdiction based on the registered office location. The Tribunal clarified that jurisdiction cannot be altered under section 60(5) of the IBC, maintaining that cases should be filed where the company's registered office is situated. The application was rejected as the Tribunal found it lacking merit, highlighting the importance of adhering to statutory provisions on jurisdiction and preventing circumvention through section 60(5) of the Code. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 30 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288697