https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288704 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, upholding termination orders issued under Section 18 of the Army Act. The Court emphasized the validity of the orders, based on material evidence and the doctrine of pleasure under Article 310 of the Constitution. It held that the termination was in the interest of national security, rejecting claims of malafides, fraud, and legal malice. The Court applied the principle of res judicata to prevent relitigation and concluded that the respondents' fundamental rights were not violated. en-us Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:40:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288704 The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, upholding termination orders issued under Section 18 of the Army Act. The Court emphasized the validity of the orders, based on material evidence and the doctrine of pleasure under Article 310 of the Constitution. It held that the termination was in the interest of national security, rejecting claims of malafides, fraud, and legal malice. The Court applied the principle of res judicata to prevent relitigation and concluded that the respondents' fundamental rights were not violated. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288704