https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288688 The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision affirming the civil court's jurisdiction to consider the validity of orders by the Board against consumers. It determined that Clause 39 of the Terms and Conditions of Supply is statutory, not contractual, and does not violate the Supply Act or the Constitution. The Court held that Clause 39 is not ultra vires the Supply Act and does not infringe on the Electricity Act. Additionally, it concluded that Clause 39's provisions do not breach Article 14 of the Constitution. en-us Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jun 2022 11:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288688 The Supreme Court upheld the Andhra Pradesh High Court's decision affirming the civil court's jurisdiction to consider the validity of orders by the Board against consumers. It determined that Clause 39 of the Terms and Conditions of Supply is statutory, not contractual, and does not violate the Supply Act or the Constitution. The Court held that Clause 39 is not ultra vires the Supply Act and does not infringe on the Electricity Act. Additionally, it concluded that Clause 39's provisions do not breach Article 14 of the Constitution. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 01 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288688