<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (9) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288687</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the statutory authorities had not correctly applied the definitions and provisions of the Factories Act, 1948. It issued a writ of certiorari to set aside the order of the Chief Inspector of Factories classifying a specific establishment as a factory. The court allowed for a fresh determination regarding the classification of the remaining establishments under the Factories Act, with the petition being granted to that extent, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:23:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (9) TMI 81 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288687</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the statutory authorities had not correctly applied the definitions and provisions of the Factories Act, 1948. It issued a writ of certiorari to set aside the order of the Chief Inspector of Factories classifying a specific establishment as a factory. The court allowed for a fresh determination regarding the classification of the remaining establishments under the Factories Act, with the petition being granted to that extent, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>