https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288679 The ITAT upheld various decisions made by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the disallowance of different expenditures and adjustments in the case. Some disallowances were upheld, while others were set aside or remitted back to the AO for fresh consideration based on previous judicial precedents and the need for further verification or examination. The ITAT's rulings were guided by earlier decisions in the assessee's own case for earlier years and relevant legal principles, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288679 The ITAT upheld various decisions made by the Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and Assessing Officer (AO) regarding the disallowance of different expenditures and adjustments in the case. Some disallowances were upheld, while others were set aside or remitted back to the AO for fresh consideration based on previous judicial precedents and the need for further verification or examination. The ITAT's rulings were guided by earlier decisions in the assessee's own case for earlier years and relevant legal principles, resulting in a mixed outcome for the parties involved. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288679