https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288681 The Calcutta HC noted that the suit was maintainable because part of the cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction, including order placement and part-payments routed through the plaintiff's banker, and leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent had been granted. In an undefended money suit, the plaintiff proved supply of goods and the defendant's liability through purchase orders, inspection documents, invoices, challans, demand letters and unchallenged oral evidence; service of demand notices was presumed from proper postal dispatch. The Court accepted the outstanding principal due, but since no agreement or proof supported 18% interest, it exercised discretion under Section 34 CPC and awarded interest at 9% per annum. The suit succeeded with a money decree. en-us Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 Jun 2020 09:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288681 The Calcutta HC noted that the suit was maintainable because part of the cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction, including order placement and part-payments routed through the plaintiff's banker, and leave under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent had been granted. In an undefended money suit, the plaintiff proved supply of goods and the defendant's liability through purchase orders, inspection documents, invoices, challans, demand letters and unchallenged oral evidence; service of demand notices was presumed from proper postal dispatch. The Court accepted the outstanding principal due, but since no agreement or proof supported 18% interest, it exercised discretion under Section 34 CPC and awarded interest at 9% per annum. The suit succeeded with a money decree. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 07 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288681