<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (4) TMI 88 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288671</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that a payment received by the assessee during the winding up of a company should not be entirely treated as dividend under section 2(6A)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Only a portion of the payment was considered as dividend, as it was not attributable to accumulated profits. The court emphasized the need to interpret legal fictions, like those in tax legislation, within their intended scope and not extend their application beyond that. Additionally, receipts exceeding the written down value on the sale of capital assets should not be automatically considered as profit unless they meet specific criteria outlined in the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 16:44:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (4) TMI 88 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288671</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that a payment received by the assessee during the winding up of a company should not be entirely treated as dividend under section 2(6A)(c) of the Income Tax Act. Only a portion of the payment was considered as dividend, as it was not attributable to accumulated profits. The court emphasized the need to interpret legal fictions, like those in tax legislation, within their intended scope and not extend their application beyond that. Additionally, receipts exceeding the written down value on the sale of capital assets should not be automatically considered as profit unless they meet specific criteria outlined in the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>