<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (8) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288670</link>
    <description>Tax liability following dissolution may attach where the new concern carries on substantially the same business in the same premises, deals in the same commodities, and takes over the stock-in-trade, because such continuity supports succession to the dissolved firm. Recovery of tax already assessed on the dissolved firm may also proceed against a former partner under the statutory recovery machinery, since the recovery certificate is treated as having the force of a civil decree. The partner-specific assessment requirement was held inapplicable where assessment had already been made on the firm, so execution could be enforced against the ex-partner notwithstanding the description used in the certificate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:45:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615712" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (8) TMI 104 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288670</link>
      <description>Tax liability following dissolution may attach where the new concern carries on substantially the same business in the same premises, deals in the same commodities, and takes over the stock-in-trade, because such continuity supports succession to the dissolved firm. Recovery of tax already assessed on the dissolved firm may also proceed against a former partner under the statutory recovery machinery, since the recovery certificate is treated as having the force of a civil decree. The partner-specific assessment requirement was held inapplicable where assessment had already been made on the firm, so execution could be enforced against the ex-partner notwithstanding the description used in the certificate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>