https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288668 The court upheld the applicant's conviction under Section 8 of the Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, III of 1947, finding the rent increase from Rs. 6/- to Rs. 12/- in contravention of the Act. Despite the applicant's argument that improvements justified the increase, the court held that the enhancements did not alter the accommodation significantly. The judgment stressed the importance of evidence-based decisions and adherence to statutory limits on rent increases, ultimately dismissing the application. en-us Fri, 09 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 22 Jun 2020 15:25:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288668 The court upheld the applicant's conviction under Section 8 of the Temporary Control of Rent and Eviction Act, III of 1947, finding the rent increase from Rs. 6/- to Rs. 12/- in contravention of the Act. Despite the applicant's argument that improvements justified the increase, the court held that the enhancements did not alter the accommodation significantly. The judgment stressed the importance of evidence-based decisions and adherence to statutory limits on rent increases, ultimately dismissing the application. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 09 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288668