<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396140</link>
    <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the petitioner the amount due, emphasizing legal provisions under the IGST Act and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The urgency was highlighted by expedited proceedings through video conferencing. Respondents were given ten days to provide instructions, with further proceedings scheduled for July 3, 2020. The judgment ensures the petitioner&#039;s refund rights are protected in line with tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615684" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 515 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396140</link>
      <description>The court directed the respondents to refund the petitioner the amount due, emphasizing legal provisions under the IGST Act and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The urgency was highlighted by expedited proceedings through video conferencing. Respondents were given ten days to provide instructions, with further proceedings scheduled for July 3, 2020. The judgment ensures the petitioner&#039;s refund rights are protected in line with tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>