<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396136</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, which found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order of assessment, including the non-set off of unabsorbed brought forward depreciation for computing deduction under Section 10A, was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Court relied on a previous Supreme Court decision in &#039;COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs. YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD.,&#039; which supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 08:15:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615675" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 511 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396136</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, which found that the Assessing Officer&#039;s order of assessment, including the non-set off of unabsorbed brought forward depreciation for computing deduction under Section 10A, was not erroneous or prejudicial to the revenue&#039;s interest. The Court relied on a previous Supreme Court decision in &#039;COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Vs. YOKOGAWA INDIA LTD.,&#039; which supported the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation. Consequently, the High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>