<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 504 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396129</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the individual assessee, directing the deletion of disallowance for payments below a specified threshold and restricting the disallowance to 30% of expenses for payments exceeding that threshold. The judgment emphasized the curative nature of the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and highlighted the importance of TDS compliance in transactions involving commission payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615665" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 504 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396129</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal filed by the individual assessee, directing the deletion of disallowance for payments below a specified threshold and restricting the disallowance to 30% of expenses for payments exceeding that threshold. The judgment emphasized the curative nature of the amendment to section 40(a)(ia) of the Act and highlighted the importance of TDS compliance in transactions involving commission payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>