<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 498 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396123</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the assessee&#039;s revision due to lack of evidence supporting stock variation and allowed the State&#039;s revision by adjusting the turnover addition based on the difference between reported sales and values in delivery notes. The assessment order was directed to be modified accordingly, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2020 06:40:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615657" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 498 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396123</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the assessee&#039;s revision due to lack of evidence supporting stock variation and allowed the State&#039;s revision by adjusting the turnover addition based on the difference between reported sales and values in delivery notes. The assessment order was directed to be modified accordingly, with parties bearing their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396123</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>