<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court set aside the CLB&#039;s order and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing on salary and perquisites payment to the Respondent. The company is directed to issue board meeting notices, and valuers are to determine the valuation of the Respondent&#039;s share within two months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court set aside the CLB&#039;s order and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing on salary and perquisites payment to the Respondent. The company is directed to issue board meeting notices, and valuers are to determine the valuation of the Respondent&#039;s share within two months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>