<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</link>
    <description>The Bombay High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing on payment of salary and perquisites. It directed that notices of board meetings be issued and that the valuation exercise be completed before reconsideration, so the dispute could be decided on a proper factual and procedural basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615644" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2784 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</link>
      <description>The Bombay High Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing on payment of salary and perquisites. It directed that notices of board meetings be issued and that the valuation exercise be completed before reconsideration, so the dispute could be decided on a proper factual and procedural basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>