https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288663 The Court condoned the delay in filing the court-appointed valuer's report and admitted it on record. It also corrected earlier orders appointing and substituting the valuer so that they are treated as having been made in Company Appeal No. 88 of 2014, thereby removing the erroneous reference to other appeals. The matter was then directed to be listed for directions, and the filing of a Special Leave Petition by the respondent was noted. en-us Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 21 Jun 2020 17:41:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288663 The Court condoned the delay in filing the court-appointed valuer's report and admitted it on record. It also corrected earlier orders appointing and substituting the valuer so that they are treated as having been made in Company Appeal No. 88 of 2014, thereby removing the erroneous reference to other appeals. The matter was then directed to be listed for directions, and the filing of a Special Leave Petition by the respondent was noted. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 15 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288663