<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 56 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288656</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitions, holding that the petitioners were considered manufacturers under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, the cotton fabrics in question attracted the provisions of Rules 7 and 9, the constitutional validity of Section 3 and Rules 7 and 9 was upheld, and the demand for duty was not time-barred under Rule 10.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 15:28:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 56 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288656</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitions, holding that the petitioners were considered manufacturers under the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, the cotton fabrics in question attracted the provisions of Rules 7 and 9, the constitutional validity of Section 3 and Rules 7 and 9 was upheld, and the demand for duty was not time-barred under Rule 10.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288656</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>