https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288652 The court dismissed the petition, finding no justification to allow it. Allegations of letting out property at a nominal rent and exclusion from the company's affairs were not substantiated. The petitioner failed to establish acts of oppression or mismanagement as required under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. All interim orders were vacated, and the petition was dismissed with no order as to cost. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288652 The court dismissed the petition, finding no justification to allow it. Allegations of letting out property at a nominal rent and exclusion from the company's affairs were not substantiated. The petitioner failed to establish acts of oppression or mismanagement as required under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956. All interim orders were vacated, and the petition was dismissed with no order as to cost. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288652