<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (7) TMI 28 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288646</link>
    <description>An alternative statutory remedy does not by itself bar writ jurisdiction; it is ordinarily a relevant restraint, but the court may still intervene where writ relief is otherwise appropriate. The commentary also states that supplies of refreshments by a members&#039; club to its members were not taxable as sales, because the statutory concept of sale required a commercial transaction in the course of business for valuable consideration. On the facts described, the club was not a profit-making concern, and its constitution negatived any intention to carry on commercial trading or distribute profits. The charging provision was therefore not extended to cover these non-profit, members-only transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (7) TMI 28 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288646</link>
      <description>An alternative statutory remedy does not by itself bar writ jurisdiction; it is ordinarily a relevant restraint, but the court may still intervene where writ relief is otherwise appropriate. The commentary also states that supplies of refreshments by a members&#039; club to its members were not taxable as sales, because the statutory concept of sale required a commercial transaction in the course of business for valuable consideration. On the facts described, the club was not a profit-making concern, and its constitution negatived any intention to carry on commercial trading or distribute profits. The charging provision was therefore not extended to cover these non-profit, members-only transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>