https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288642 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming its jurisdiction to pass interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, even against non-parties to the arbitration agreement claiming under a party. It upheld the appointment of a Court Receiver for property possession and redevelopment, emphasizing the binding nature of the Society's General Body decisions on all members. The appellants' challenge to the Development Agreement terms was rejected, and the court found the interim measures just and necessary for project progress, ensuring the appellants' rights in newly constructed flats post-redevelopment. en-us Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jun 2020 10:17:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288642 The court dismissed the appeal, affirming its jurisdiction to pass interim measures under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, even against non-parties to the arbitration agreement claiming under a party. It upheld the appointment of a Court Receiver for property possession and redevelopment, emphasizing the binding nature of the Society's General Body decisions on all members. The appellants' challenge to the Development Agreement terms was rejected, and the court found the interim measures just and necessary for project progress, ensuring the appellants' rights in newly constructed flats post-redevelopment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288642