<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1952 (8) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288639</link>
    <description>The court set aside the convictions and sentences and directed a retrial to determine whether the persons employed in the various departments were workers as defined in the Act and whether the departments could be considered separate entities. The court held that in respect of those departments where the provisions of the Factories Act were not applicable, there would be no retrial, and the order of the lower court would stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 09:54:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1952 (8) TMI 30 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288639</link>
      <description>The court set aside the convictions and sentences and directed a retrial to determine whether the persons employed in the various departments were workers as defined in the Act and whether the departments could be considered separate entities. The court held that in respect of those departments where the provisions of the Factories Act were not applicable, there would be no retrial, and the order of the lower court would stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 1952 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288639</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>