<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 480 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396105</link>
    <description>The court allowed the petition challenging the validity of Rule 117(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was permitted to electronically upload form TRAN-I or avail input tax credit (ITC) in the monthly return GSTR-3B by a specified date. Failure to comply would allow the petitioner to claim ITC in the subsequent return. The court emphasized the importance of not denying credit to dealers facing technical difficulties, citing constitutional provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 480 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396105</link>
      <description>The court allowed the petition challenging the validity of Rule 117(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017. The petitioner was permitted to electronically upload form TRAN-I or avail input tax credit (ITC) in the monthly return GSTR-3B by a specified date. Failure to comply would allow the petitioner to claim ITC in the subsequent return. The court emphasized the importance of not denying credit to dealers facing technical difficulties, citing constitutional provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>