<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (9) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22556</link>
    <description>Section 155 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was treated as an independent power to amend a partner&#039;s assessment where the firm&#039;s assessment or reassessment showed that share income had not been correctly included. The provision was held not to be confined to a &quot;mistake apparent from the record&quot; under section 154, and the absence of the older statutory fiction from the 1922 Act did not narrow its operation. On the facts, clubbing the minor daughters&#039; share income with the assessee&#039;s income under section 64 was not a debatable issue and the amendment was within jurisdiction. The reference was answered in the affirmative and the assessment was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:38:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (9) TMI 29 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22556</link>
      <description>Section 155 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was treated as an independent power to amend a partner&#039;s assessment where the firm&#039;s assessment or reassessment showed that share income had not been correctly included. The provision was held not to be confined to a &quot;mistake apparent from the record&quot; under section 154, and the absence of the older statutory fiction from the 1922 Act did not narrow its operation. On the facts, clubbing the minor daughters&#039; share income with the assessee&#039;s income under section 64 was not a debatable issue and the amendment was within jurisdiction. The reference was answered in the affirmative and the assessment was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22556</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>