<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (7) TMI 1577 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288630</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the income after considering the method of accounting followed by the assessee and allowing the benefit of accumulation under section 11(2) of the Act. The tribunal also upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on various disallowances and exemptions claimed by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2020 06:03:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615544" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (7) TMI 1577 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288630</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee were partly allowed, and the appeals filed by the Revenue were dismissed. The tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-compute the income after considering the method of accounting followed by the assessee and allowing the benefit of accumulation under section 11(2) of the Act. The tribunal also upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decisions on various disallowances and exemptions claimed by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288630</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>