<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 433 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396058</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled that income from the sale of shares held as capital assets after conversion from stock in trade should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The Court emphasized statutory interpretation principles and noted the absence of relevant provisions in the Income Tax Act at the time. The decision favored the assessee, overturning the tribunal&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 433 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396058</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled that income from the sale of shares held as capital assets after conversion from stock in trade should be treated as capital gains, not business income. The Court emphasized statutory interpretation principles and noted the absence of relevant provisions in the Income Tax Act at the time. The decision favored the assessee, overturning the tribunal&#039;s order and allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>