<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (8) TMI 225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288626</link>
    <description>The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 confined the Port Trust Board&#039;s lien to specific goods for which rates or rents were due, and did not create a general lien over an importer&#039;s goods for past dues. The Board&#039;s receipt under Section 42(2) was only an acknowledgment of goods taken charge of, and the statutory relationship did not amount to a contractual or implied bailment with the consignee so as to attract Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Act also operated as a complete code governing assessment, recovery, lien, sale and suit for port charges, excluding reliance on the general lien of a wharfinger under Section 171 to enlarge the Board&#039;s statutory rights.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 17:25:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615492" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (8) TMI 225 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288626</link>
      <description>The Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 confined the Port Trust Board&#039;s lien to specific goods for which rates or rents were due, and did not create a general lien over an importer&#039;s goods for past dues. The Board&#039;s receipt under Section 42(2) was only an acknowledgment of goods taken charge of, and the statutory relationship did not amount to a contractual or implied bailment with the consignee so as to attract Section 171 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Act also operated as a complete code governing assessment, recovery, lien, sale and suit for port charges, excluding reliance on the general lien of a wharfinger under Section 171 to enlarge the Board&#039;s statutory rights.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288626</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>