<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396049</link>
    <description>EPCG scheme import of a motor vehicle treated as imported capital goods; allegation of personal use by a director was unsupported by evidence, and no breach of EPCG licence conditions was established, so concessional import remained valid. Export obligation performance documents were accepted by the competent authority, and the import declaration disclosed relevant facts; therefore the impugned adverse administrative action was set aside and relief granted to the importer. The analysis focuses on admissibility of evidence to prove misuse, applicability of EPCG conditions to movable capital equipment, and the effect of accepted export obligation documentation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 14:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 424 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396049</link>
      <description>EPCG scheme import of a motor vehicle treated as imported capital goods; allegation of personal use by a director was unsupported by evidence, and no breach of EPCG licence conditions was established, so concessional import remained valid. Export obligation performance documents were accepted by the competent authority, and the import declaration disclosed relevant facts; therefore the impugned adverse administrative action was set aside and relief granted to the importer. The analysis focuses on admissibility of evidence to prove misuse, applicability of EPCG conditions to movable capital equipment, and the effect of accepted export obligation documentation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>