https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288624 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC must be assessed on distinct pre-arrest factors, including the gravity of the accusation, the likelihood of the accused remaining available for trial, possible witness tampering, and the wider interests of the State. Where an order granting such relief in a serious offence case was made without applying these principles and instead reflected irrelevant or misconceived considerations, the grant was unjustified. The Court treated this as a legal error capable of causing miscarriage of justice and held that the anticipatory bail order was liable to be set aside. en-us Wed, 17 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:26:02 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288624 Anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC must be assessed on distinct pre-arrest factors, including the gravity of the accusation, the likelihood of the accused remaining available for trial, possible witness tampering, and the wider interests of the State. Where an order granting such relief in a serious offence case was made without applying these principles and instead reflected irrelevant or misconceived considerations, the grant was unjustified. The Court treated this as a legal error capable of causing miscarriage of justice and held that the anticipatory bail order was liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 17 Apr 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288624