https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396046 In a PMLA prosecution, bail was granted where the applicant had consistently cooperated in both the predicate-offence and money-laundering investigations, had not been arrested during the inquiry, and no provisional attachment order had been issued. The Court also noted that the complaint was filed after substantial delay and that the record lacked supporting witness material annexed to substantiate the allegations. On those facts, the Court treated the matter as fit for bail without expressing any view on the merits, indicating that cooperation, absence of arrest or attachment, and inadequate supporting material may justify release. en-us Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:20:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396046 In a PMLA prosecution, bail was granted where the applicant had consistently cooperated in both the predicate-offence and money-laundering investigations, had not been arrested during the inquiry, and no provisional attachment order had been issued. The Court also noted that the complaint was filed after substantial delay and that the record lacked supporting witness material annexed to substantiate the allegations. On those facts, the Court treated the matter as fit for bail without expressing any view on the merits, indicating that cooperation, absence of arrest or attachment, and inadequate supporting material may justify release. Case-Laws Money Laundering Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396046