https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22548 The court upheld the judgment, quashing the second respondent's order to purchase an immovable property in Madras. The order was found invalid due to errors in stating the property purchase, lack of natural justice principles application, and failure to communicate reasons for the decision. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and fairness in quasi-judicial orders. The writ appeal was dismissed, and related civil miscellaneous petitions seeking interim orders were also denied. en-us Fri, 20 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:18:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22548 The court upheld the judgment, quashing the second respondent's order to purchase an immovable property in Madras. The order was found invalid due to errors in stating the property purchase, lack of natural justice principles application, and failure to communicate reasons for the decision. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and fairness in quasi-judicial orders. The writ appeal was dismissed, and related civil miscellaneous petitions seeking interim orders were also denied. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 20 Apr 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22548