https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288623 A sale of immovable property was treated as a transfer of ownership, not a transfer of an actionable claim, so no separate notice requirement for actionable claims applied to the rent claim arising after sale. The sale-deed was held supported by consideration and effective to pass title. Findings on paternity and the absence of remarriage were based on evidence and were not open to interference in second appeal. The tenancy notice was valid because, read as a whole, it complied with the statutory period despite present-tense wording. The disputed land was not shown to be accommodation under the rent-control law or to have been let for manufacturing purposes, and a proposed new statute did not justify adjournment. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:09:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288623 A sale of immovable property was treated as a transfer of ownership, not a transfer of an actionable claim, so no separate notice requirement for actionable claims applied to the rent claim arising after sale. The sale-deed was held supported by consideration and effective to pass title. Findings on paternity and the absence of remarriage were based on evidence and were not open to interference in second appeal. The tenancy notice was valid because, read as a whole, it complied with the statutory period despite present-tense wording. The disputed land was not shown to be accommodation under the rent-control law or to have been let for manufacturing purposes, and a proposed new statute did not justify adjournment. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Mar 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288623