https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288613 The High Court directed that coercive recovery steps for the balance tax should not be taken pending the appeal's disposal. The petitioner was required to deposit 2/3rds of the disputed tax within four weeks, with credit for previous payments. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs. The dispute over handling charges and warranty claims as post-sale consideration was resolved in favor of preventing coercive recovery actions until the appeal was finalized, with a portion of the disputed tax to be deposited within a specified timeframe. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Jun 2020 10:30:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288613 The High Court directed that coercive recovery steps for the balance tax should not be taken pending the appeal's disposal. The petitioner was required to deposit 2/3rds of the disputed tax within four weeks, with credit for previous payments. The writ petition was disposed of with no costs. The dispute over handling charges and warranty claims as post-sale consideration was resolved in favor of preventing coercive recovery actions until the appeal was finalized, with a portion of the disputed tax to be deposited within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288613