<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s order in most respects, except for the valuation of reconditioned spinning machines and equipment, which was remanded for a fresh decision. The respondents&#039; cross-objection was dismissed. The appeal and cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 11:29:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 403 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Collector&#039;s order in most respects, except for the valuation of reconditioned spinning machines and equipment, which was remanded for a fresh decision. The respondents&#039; cross-objection was dismissed. The appeal and cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>