<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 707 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288602</link>
    <description>Erection, installation and commissioning charges were not treated as consulting engineer services for the relevant period because the Board&#039;s circular clarified that such activity fell outside that tax category. Relying on that clarification, the earlier service tax demand could not be sustained, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 18:04:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 707 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288602</link>
      <description>Erection, installation and commissioning charges were not treated as consulting engineer services for the relevant period because the Board&#039;s circular clarified that such activity fell outside that tax category. Relying on that clarification, the earlier service tax demand could not be sustained, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288602</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>