<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 123 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22543</link>
    <description>HC held that &quot;full value of consideration&quot; contemplates additions and deductions and that clause (i) of section 48-expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer-is broader than expenditure &quot;for the transfer.&quot; Payments absolutely necessary to effect transfer, including compensation to remove encumbrances, qualify as deductible expenditure. Accordingly, the sale consideration must be reduced by the compensation paid, and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 13:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61542" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 123 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22543</link>
      <description>HC held that &quot;full value of consideration&quot; contemplates additions and deductions and that clause (i) of section 48-expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the transfer-is broader than expenditure &quot;for the transfer.&quot; Payments absolutely necessary to effect transfer, including compensation to remove encumbrances, qualify as deductible expenditure. Accordingly, the sale consideration must be reduced by the compensation paid, and the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>