https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288595 The court found that the second plaintiff was lawfully married to Ramaswami Goundan and that the first plaintiff was his legitimate son. The dharmasasanam was deemed partly nominal and partly operative, charging the properties with an annual expenditure. The first plaintiff inherited the properties subject to the trust, and the second plaintiff was entitled to manage them. The court dismissed the first defendant's claim to manage the trust properties, ruling that the charitable endowment for gurupooja at the samadhi was invalid under Hindu Law. The appeals were dismissed, with costs awarded, and the dedication of the properties failed. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:48:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288595 The court found that the second plaintiff was lawfully married to Ramaswami Goundan and that the first plaintiff was his legitimate son. The dharmasasanam was deemed partly nominal and partly operative, charging the properties with an annual expenditure. The first plaintiff inherited the properties subject to the trust, and the second plaintiff was entitled to manage them. The court dismissed the first defendant's claim to manage the trust properties, ruling that the charitable endowment for gurupooja at the samadhi was invalid under Hindu Law. The appeals were dismissed, with costs awarded, and the dedication of the properties failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Jan 1946 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288595