<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1970 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288594</link>
    <description>A dedication of property for worship, offerings, festivals and feeding of Brahmins was treated as a valid religious and charitable endowment even though the contemplated temple had not been completed. A suit by the trustee to recover trust property from a stranger in wrongful possession was outside the statutory bar because the dispute concerned recovery of possession, with trust character only incidental. The special limitation rule for property transferred by a prior manager applied, and time ran from the death or removal of that manager, so the recovery claim was treated as timely and the adverse possession plea failed. Interim trustee appointment was considered sufficient to support the suit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:43:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1970 (1) TMI 90 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288594</link>
      <description>A dedication of property for worship, offerings, festivals and feeding of Brahmins was treated as a valid religious and charitable endowment even though the contemplated temple had not been completed. A suit by the trustee to recover trust property from a stranger in wrongful possession was outside the statutory bar because the dispute concerned recovery of possession, with trust character only incidental. The special limitation rule for property transferred by a prior manager applied, and time ran from the death or removal of that manager, so the recovery claim was treated as timely and the adverse possession plea failed. Interim trustee appointment was considered sufficient to support the suit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>