<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (10) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288593</link>
    <description>Superior police officers may receive information about a cognizable offence and investigate within their jurisdiction without acting illegally merely because the information was not given only to the officer in charge of a police station. The challenge to a special procedure therefore failed because the criminal procedure framework permitted the use of CID officers. The equality-based challenge also failed because the materials did not show that the petitioners were singled out for impermissible or discriminatory treatment. On that basis, the institution and investigation of the cases were treated as legally valid, and no constitutional or procedural illegality was established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:13:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (10) TMI 102 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288593</link>
      <description>Superior police officers may receive information about a cognizable offence and investigate within their jurisdiction without acting illegally merely because the information was not given only to the officer in charge of a police station. The challenge to a special procedure therefore failed because the criminal procedure framework permitted the use of CID officers. The equality-based challenge also failed because the materials did not show that the petitioners were singled out for impermissible or discriminatory treatment. On that basis, the institution and investigation of the cases were treated as legally valid, and no constitutional or procedural illegality was established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288593</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>