https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288592 Where the original deity was still believed to be embedded at the old temple site, the installation of the utsavar in a newly built temple and use of some old materials did not by itself extinguish the religious character of the original site. On those facts, villagers were not precluded from renovating the old temple, so no injunction could be granted against reconstruction. The statutory procedure for inquiry into a religious institution alleged to have ceased to exist did not apply because cessation at the old site was itself the disputed issue. The suit was therefore not barred by that provision, but the claim for restraint failed. en-us Tue, 31 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2020 12:01:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288592 Where the original deity was still believed to be embedded at the old temple site, the installation of the utsavar in a newly built temple and use of some old materials did not by itself extinguish the religious character of the original site. On those facts, villagers were not precluded from renovating the old temple, so no injunction could be granted against reconstruction. The statutory procedure for inquiry into a religious institution alleged to have ceased to exist did not apply because cessation at the old site was itself the disputed issue. The suit was therefore not barred by that provision, but the claim for restraint failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 31 Oct 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288592