https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396040 The court declined to quash the final confiscation order but granted relief to protect the goods and state's interest in a case involving the detention and confiscation of goods due to document discrepancies. The applicant, a firm proprietor, challenged the detention as illegal, while the Government Pleader cited irregularities in documents and goods quality. The court directed the applicant to deposit a specified amount for tax and penalty, provide a bank guarantee, and allowed the adjudication proceedings to continue independently to safeguard both parties' interests. en-us Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396040 The court declined to quash the final confiscation order but granted relief to protect the goods and state's interest in a case involving the detention and confiscation of goods due to document discrepancies. The applicant, a firm proprietor, challenged the detention as illegal, while the Government Pleader cited irregularities in documents and goods quality. The court directed the applicant to deposit a specified amount for tax and penalty, provide a bank guarantee, and allowed the adjudication proceedings to continue independently to safeguard both parties' interests. Case-Laws GST Tue, 16 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396040