https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288585 A charge of corrupt practice under Section 123(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 must be proved by clear, corroborated evidence establishing each essential ingredient, including hiring or procurement of the vehicle, the candidate's knowledge or consent, and free conveyance of electors. On that standard, allegations concerning Truck No. HRR-5167 and Tractor No. DLL-9 with Trailer No. MPE-8748 failed for want of reliable proof. The alleged payment to Mange Ram and any omission from election expenses also remained unproved because the supporting material was inconsistent and insufficient to establish actual payment or undisclosed expenditure. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2020 11:04:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288585 A charge of corrupt practice under Section 123(5) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 must be proved by clear, corroborated evidence establishing each essential ingredient, including hiring or procurement of the vehicle, the candidate's knowledge or consent, and free conveyance of electors. On that standard, allegations concerning Truck No. HRR-5167 and Tractor No. DLL-9 with Trailer No. MPE-8748 failed for want of reliable proof. The alleged payment to Mange Ram and any omission from election expenses also remained unproved because the supporting material was inconsistent and insufficient to establish actual payment or undisclosed expenditure. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Feb 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288585