<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 403 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396028</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer. It was concluded that the assessee had already paid taxes on long-term capital gains in preceding years and should not be taxed again on the same income in the relevant year. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of no double taxation, leading to the deletion of the addition classified as business income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 403 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396028</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, deleting the addition made by the Assessing Officer. It was concluded that the assessee had already paid taxes on long-term capital gains in preceding years and should not be taxed again on the same income in the relevant year. The Tribunal emphasized the principle of no double taxation, leading to the deletion of the addition classified as business income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>