<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 402 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396027</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to a defective show-cause notice lacking specificity on the grounds for penalty. The decision was based on judicial precedents emphasizing the need for clarity in penalty notices to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:56:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615379" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 402 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396027</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, canceling the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) due to a defective show-cause notice lacking specificity on the grounds for penalty. The decision was based on judicial precedents emphasizing the need for clarity in penalty notices to adhere to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>