https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288583 Section 9 of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 and Clause 70 of the 1948 Scheme were treated as a permissible delegation because the Act laid down the legislative policy, fixed the outer limits of punishment, and confined the scheme-making power to statutory details; the provisions were therefore not ultra vires. The Scheme was also held capable of providing penalties for breach, since the Act expressly authorised penal provisions and the absence of a specific preamble reference to Section 9 did not affect validity. On the colliery agreement, the petitioners retained substantial incidents of ownership and so fell within the statutory concept of owner and employer; liability and conviction were sustained. en-us Tue, 01 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:55:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288583 Section 9 of the Coal Mines Provident Fund and Bonus Schemes Act, 1948 and Clause 70 of the 1948 Scheme were treated as a permissible delegation because the Act laid down the legislative policy, fixed the outer limits of punishment, and confined the scheme-making power to statutory details; the provisions were therefore not ultra vires. The Scheme was also held capable of providing penalties for breach, since the Act expressly authorised penal provisions and the absence of a specific preamble reference to Section 9 did not affect validity. On the colliery agreement, the petitioners retained substantial incidents of ownership and so fell within the statutory concept of owner and employer; liability and conviction were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 01 Apr 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288583