https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396014 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, a software and IT services company, in their challenge against the Assessment Order under the CST Act for the year 2015-16. The Court found that the petitioner was denied a proper opportunity for a personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Despite the existence of an alternative appeal remedy, the Court allowed the Writ Petition under Article 226, setting aside the Assessment Order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration after ensuring a proper personal hearing within two months. en-us Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Dec 2020 11:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396014 The Court held in favor of the petitioner, a software and IT services company, in their challenge against the Assessment Order under the CST Act for the year 2015-16. The Court found that the petitioner was denied a proper opportunity for a personal hearing, violating principles of natural justice. Despite the existence of an alternative appeal remedy, the Court allowed the Writ Petition under Article 226, setting aside the Assessment Order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration after ensuring a proper personal hearing within two months. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396014