https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396013 Where a statutory VAT appeal is pending, recovery of the remaining disputed demand may be stayed if coercive collection would render the appeal ineffective. The petitioner had already deposited two-thirds of the disputed tax, and the Telangana HC considered protection under Section 31(3)(c) of the A.P. VAT Act, 2005 appropriate to preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy before the Tribunal. Recovery of the balance disputed tax was therefore stayed until disposal of the appeal, while the merits of the tax dispute were left for the appellate forum to decide. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Jun 2020 10:03:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396013 Where a statutory VAT appeal is pending, recovery of the remaining disputed demand may be stayed if coercive collection would render the appeal ineffective. The petitioner had already deposited two-thirds of the disputed tax, and the Telangana HC considered protection under Section 31(3)(c) of the A.P. VAT Act, 2005 appropriate to preserve the efficacy of the appellate remedy before the Tribunal. Recovery of the balance disputed tax was therefore stayed until disposal of the appeal, while the merits of the tax dispute were left for the appellate forum to decide. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396013