https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288581 The petitioner was held ineligible for grant of alternate accommodation, leading to the filing of an Appeal. The Court decided that the Petition need not be kept pending as the Appeal was already preferred. The Court ordered that the Appeal on the issue of eligibility for alternate accommodation should be decided by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation expeditiously, within four months. If found eligible, alternate accommodation should be offered, and the petitioner would have three weeks to accept it. If the Appeal is dismissed, the petitioner's structure should not be demolished for three weeks from the date of communication of the dismissal order. en-us Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288581 The petitioner was held ineligible for grant of alternate accommodation, leading to the filing of an Appeal. The Court decided that the Petition need not be kept pending as the Appeal was already preferred. The Court ordered that the Appeal on the issue of eligibility for alternate accommodation should be decided by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation expeditiously, within four months. If found eligible, alternate accommodation should be offered, and the petitioner would have three weeks to accept it. If the Appeal is dismissed, the petitioner's structure should not be demolished for three weeks from the date of communication of the dismissal order. Case-Laws GST Fri, 16 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288581