<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (11) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288574</link>
    <description>In a mortgage suit, the preliminary decree is final as to matters that ought to have been decided up to that stage, so rents and profits realized before that decree and not then brought into account cannot later be reopened once the decree has become final. By contrast, the mortgagee in possession remains bound to account for net receipts realised after the preliminary decree, because the mortgage relationship continues until the final decree. The court also noted that estoppel did not arise, as the necessary elements of representation, reliance, and detriment were not established on the facts described.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 16:35:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (11) TMI 121 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288574</link>
      <description>In a mortgage suit, the preliminary decree is final as to matters that ought to have been decided up to that stage, so rents and profits realized before that decree and not then brought into account cannot later be reopened once the decree has become final. By contrast, the mortgagee in possession remains bound to account for net receipts realised after the preliminary decree, because the mortgage relationship continues until the final decree. The court also noted that estoppel did not arise, as the necessary elements of representation, reliance, and detriment were not established on the facts described.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288574</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>