<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (3) TMI 665 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288572</link>
    <description>Photographic activity is taxable as a works contract only when the photographer works upon customer-owned film or negatives and thereby transfers property in goods involved in the processing. Where the photographer uses his own camera, film and materials and supplies the finished print, the transaction is a service of skill and labour, not a works contract, and no sales tax is exigible. Processing exposed film or negatives supplied by customers and supplying prints, however, falls within the deemed sale concept and the statutory definition of works contract. The first category escaped tax, while the customer-supplied film and negative processing categories were held taxable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:23:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615332" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (3) TMI 665 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288572</link>
      <description>Photographic activity is taxable as a works contract only when the photographer works upon customer-owned film or negatives and thereby transfers property in goods involved in the processing. Where the photographer uses his own camera, film and materials and supplies the finished print, the transaction is a service of skill and labour, not a works contract, and no sales tax is exigible. Processing exposed film or negatives supplied by customers and supplying prints, however, falls within the deemed sale concept and the statutory definition of works contract. The first category escaped tax, while the customer-supplied film and negative processing categories were held taxable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>